Public
Activity Feed Discussions Blogs Bookmarks Files

Training into Performance

I believe that training and updating your knowledge to how things are currently is important, but if you're not interested in the subject material or "have to do trainings" because it's part of a requirement, then that knowledge is gone as soon as the test is passed.  The main point about the discussions so far are about keeping students accountable, flipping the classroom and holding them accountable for knowledge they retain, and this has its benefits.  The hardest thing for anyone to do is make someone have an interest in something that does not interest them.  I've learned through experiences from my own and from the views of others that even if you explain the benefits of knowledge you'll be met with resistance because someone might not want to go down that particular path. 

 

Has anyone else suffered through these issues as well?  If so, please comment and give some advice on how you have gotten through to people who learn just to get by but forget information even though it is important and relevant.

yes you hit on "making someone interested" even if they are not, is like feeding someone that is not hungry. All  you can do is put out the information and only when it effects them will they concider learning. My field is different, i tech in the automitive setting and with learning comes hands on application. If you dont learn in the class it will show up in the hands on part of the exercise. only when the student can not get it to work (programing commands) how to build something, scuba diving. will they really want to learn.

 

Sign In to comment