John Cleary

John Cleary

About me

Dr. John Cleary

John Cleary currently teaches Philosophy at Beal University in Maine. He has also taught English, Speech/Drama, American/ World Literature and Philosophy at a high school (17 years) before transitioning to teaching Philosophy with college students for the past 12 years. He hold a B.A. in Philosophy from Ohio Wesleyan University, and M.A. in English Education from The City College (C.U.N.Y.) and doctorate in Pedagogy and Philosophy from the Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children at Montclair State University. He is also a professional actor, poet, folk musician and part time resident of Canada. His research interests focus on the relationship between the information environment and Philosophy.

Activity

  • Plan for discomfort when traditional roles and structures of classroom authority are disrupted
  • What does this mean?

Yes, but there is also the danger of encountering nonsense (which many people are attracted to) and offensive material very easily.

One has to be careful that there use of Twitter is not another excuse to see one's education as a form of entertainment. 

Where is the sustained inquiry when reading people's brief explanations on a twitter page? There isn't any.

Multiple evaluations are important, as long as they are not marred in the quagmire of bureaucratic decision making about

teaching and test scores as a means of evaluation.

 

I disagree. Students may be paying tuition, but they should not be seen as consumers. This is the business model (vocabulary) imposed on the academy.

When I teach I do not see myself as a salesman of knowledge, and the institution I work in is not a corporation or a business. 

Students are consumers of information, but not market consumers. To commodify knowledge is to turn the classroom into a shopping center...which it isn't.

 

This is about making constructive criticism. It is also attempting to make objective standards on how to assess learning and teaching.

 

We need another metaphor other than scaffolding. It evokes the gallows.

I appreciate the scaffolding metaphor, (although it makes one think of a gallows t00) but it evokes a narrow defintiion of how students learn and think. Also, the emphasis on"tasks" and "staying on task" paints a picture of students as factory workers. Students learn to "climb" but they can also learn to investigate and explore without being subjected to the hidden curriculum of intellectual obedience. This may include passive acceptance to the opinions of their teachers. Students, and even children, should be encouraged to think for themselves. There should far more emphasis in thinking as part of the scaffold metaphor.… >>>

"Just as in construction, poorly built learning scaffolds can sabotage future learning." Sabotage is the wrong word here. You mean undermine the foundation to learning.

The Scaffold metaphor works, but it is still insufficient. This is otherwise known as foundationalism. However, it is hardly comprehenesive of the full measure of the way students can learn.

What about the role of imagination and interdisciplinary learning? Where does this fit into the metaphor?

See coherentism. Some students learn discursively...like contemplating stars in the sky or a "web of possibilities." Not all learning needs to be predictable or lock-step. This is far too… >>>

What do you mean by "When students are misleading themselves" What's an example? Do you mean mean when they are making mistakes in reasoning?

Do you mean they are not thinking the way the instructor is telling them to think about a complex problem?  If so, this is problematic. What about the role of creativity?

"Remember, what you won't tolerate in your F2F course, you should never tolerate in your online course."
 

This should read "wouldn't" not won't. Also, students using an Alias? What's preventing friends of students from completing assignments?

End of Content

End of Content