Public
Activity Feed Discussions Blogs Bookmarks Files

Pitfalls When Developing Rubrics

I get many questions about developing good rubrics.  There are some common mistakes individuals make which lead to flaws and the improper design and use of rubrics. Here are a few pitfalls.  Stay away from them!  

  • Putting too many criteria in the rubric: Four to eight criteria is typically optimal.
  • Using “quantity” criteria components in a rubric: For example, “Report cites 10 sources.” You can use a checklist for this. 
  • Using a varying scale to judge one criterion: If the top criterion is “Sources support report’s purpose statement” and it’s worth 5-6 points, what is the difference between 5 points and 6 points? 
  • Not allowing for students to see improvement: Criteria should be assessed in a way for students to see improvement in their work or skill. 
  • Not connecting the assignment or project to course outcomes within the rubric: When objectives/learning outcomes are included in the rubric, students understand how the assignment or project relates to the objectives of the course. 

 There are other pitfalls, but avoid these common ones.

 

What role if any should rubrics play in evaluating institutional effectiveness? This goes beyond the traditional use of rubrics as a platform to standardize grading across a curriculum but interested in how else rubrics can be used to enhance the academic efforts of an institution. Thanks for any feedback you can provide.

Tena,  Thank you, this is very helpful as I develop the lesson plan for a new class.  I'm at the part where I am developing the rubric.  Bill

These tips are very useful. I particularly agree with your advice to ensure the student learning outcomes are clearly aligned with the criteria rubric. Students have a difficult time as it is deciphering what's in it for them. Ultimately the rubric communicates quality of their work and the standards by which said work is measured. Tstyn

Sign In to comment